data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a1e/d2a1e536fd451f178bfe9ede51ccaa5a47442e9a" alt=""
Personally, I didn't have a problem with the photos I saw of Pat Bateman and his infamous magazine. The point of porn is to provide a product to help consumers get off. If Pat's scene does the trick, so be it. What I am highly weary of, as a consumer, is how studios over emphasize the fact that a given model is gay for pay. Why does a model have to have a label? If part of the function of porn is to provide fantasy, why not feature models as just plain men? This is why I think Randy Blue does such a good job. There is no having to guess what a model's orientation is. Some studios do interviews and will ask if a model is gay or straight.
Who cares?